This course was another one of my shortlisted courses as I was very interested in certain court cases that shaped the Canadian society. These included cases on abortion, hate speech, niqab rights, and also voting rights for prisoners. When reading the course description, it seemed that all of these cases would be discussed and thus I chose this course. However, out of all my courses, this one would have to be the hardest I've taken this term. The professor, Emmett MacFarlane, is well-known for being a very smart and talented researcher, especially in the field of constitutional law and rights. I probably put about 2-3 times more effort into this course than any other course, yet still ended up with a substantially lower mark. His lectures were long (took the whole 3 hours with little discussion and class participation) and also were full of small things that you had to remember. Course consisted of weekly reading summaries, a midterm and final, and also a an essay. Readings were very long and consisted of 60-100 page court documents or a bunch of stuff from academic journals. The midterm marks were very poor for the class, as 37% of the class failed the midterm. Class average for that midterm was probably low 60s, with the highest mark being only the mid to high 80s. Many people (including me) in that class frequently got 80s and 90s in virtually every other Poli Sci course, so there was a clear discrepancy. Essays were marked okay (class average 74%), but again no 90s were given. I feel like the essays were marked more leniently to offset the poor midterms. However, the grade distribution was still lower than normal for a third-year honours level course. In the end, I managed to get an 82% which is still a good mark, but many people did very poorly in that course. I still anticipate that I will be taking courses with MacFarlane in the future. He's one of the smartest professors in the PSCI department, and his courses are very interesting, so it's worth a lower mark in the long run.